Study of Various RCC Frame Structures: A Review

Authors

  • Isha Bedi Author
  • Girish Sharma Author
  • Abhishek Gupta Author

Keywords:

Structure Design, ETABS, High Rise Buildings, Plan Irregularity, Pushover Analysis, Location of shear wall

Abstract

We have reviewed the different-different papers like Effective location of shear wall on performance of building frame subjected to earthquake load and Structural Analysis of a MultiStoreyed Building using ETABS for different Plan Configurations. In Paper “Effective location of shear wall on performance of building frame subjected to earthquake load” they have studied four models of eight-storey structure is considered, which one of model is uncovered casing and different models with shear divider area in position-1, position-2, position-3 in every seismic zone and relating base-shear and sidelong uprooting get from the sucker bend utilizing Etabs programming. Arrangement of a shear divider impacts the seismic execution of the structure with reference to quality and horizontal relocation. Shear wall in position-3 performs better and the base shear increased by 9.82% when compared to the frame without shear wall. Shear wall in position-3 performs better with reference to lateral displacement and it reduces by 26.7% when compared to the frame without shear wall. The arrangement of shear divider position in a fitting area is worthwhile and the structure performs better for a current or another structure. In paper "Auxiliary Analysis of a MultiStoreyed Building utilizing ETABS for various Plan Configurations" they have broke down the multistoreyed building mirrored that the story toppling minute shifts contrarily with story stature. In addition, L-shape, I-shape sort structures give practically comparative reaction against the toppling minute. Storey drift displacement increased with storey height up to 6th storey reaching to maximum value and then started decreasing. From dynamic analysis, mode shapes are generated and it can be concluded that asymmetrical plans undergo more deformation than symmetrical plans. Asymmetrical plans should be adopted considering into gaps

Downloads

Published

2017-04-28

Issue

Section

Articles